|It’s not Africa; it’s Chicago|
Published on December 31, 2012, an article at David Horowitz’s Front Page Magazine [America Doesn’t Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Gang Problem, by Daniel Greenfield] dared address the 800,000 lbs. gorilla making America’s major cities veritable war zones:
Chicago’s murder numbers have hit that magic 500. Baltimore’s murder toll has passed 200. In Philly, it’s up to 324, the highest since 2007. In Detroit, it’s approaching 400, another record. In New Orleans, it’s almost at 200. New York City is down to 414 from 508. In Los Angeles, it’s over 500. In St. Louis it’s 113 and 130 in Oakland. It’s 121 in Memphis and 76 in Birmingham.
Washington, D.C., home of the boys and girls who can solve it all, is nearing its own big 100.
Those 12 cities alone account for nearly 3,200 dead and nearly a quarter of all murders in the United States. And we haven’t even visited sunny Atlanta or chilly Cleveland.
These cities are the heartland of America’s real gun culture. It isn’t the bitter gun-and-bible clingers in McCain and Romney territory who are racking up a more horrifying annual kill rate than Al Qaeda; it’s Obama’s own voting base.
Chicago, where Obama delivered his victory speech, has homicide numbers that match all of Japan and are higher than Spain, Poland and pre-war Syria. If Chicago gets any worse, it will find itself passing the number of murders for the entire country of Canada.
Chicago’s murder rate of 15.65 per 100,000 people looks nothing like the American 4.2 rate, the Midwestern 4.5 or the Illinois’ 5.6 rates, but it does look like the murder rates in failed countries like Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. To achieve Chicago’s murder rate, African countries usually have to experience a bloody genocidal civil war or decades of tyranny.
But Chicago isn’t even all that unique. Or the worst case scenario. That would be New Orleans which at an incredible 72.8 murder rate is ten times higher than the national average. If New Orleans were a country, it would have the 2nd highest murder rate in the world, beating out El Salvador.
Louisiana went red for Romney 58 to 40, but Orleans Parish went blue for Obama 80 to 17.
St. Louis has a murder rate just a little lower than Belize. Baltimore has a worse murder rate than South Africa and Detroit has a worse murder rate than Colombia. Obama won both St. Louis and Baltimore by comfortable margins. He won Detroit’s Wayne County 73 to 26.
Homicide rates like these show that something is broken, but it isn’t broken among the Romney voters rushing to stock up on assault rifles every time Obama begins threatening their right to buy them; it’s broken among Obama’s base.
Any serious conversation about gun violence and gun culture has to begin at home; in Chicago, in Baltimore, in New York City, in Los Angeles and in Washington, D.C.
Voting for Obama does not make people innately homicidal. Just look at Seattle which is agonizing over its 26 murders. That’s about the same number of murders as East St. Louis which has only 27,000 people to Seattle’s 620,000.
So what is happening in Chicago to drive it to the gates of hell ahead of Zimbabwe and Rwanda?
A breakdown of the Chicago killing fields shows that 83% of those murdered in Chicago last year had criminal records. In Philly, it’s 75%. In Milwaukee it’s 77% percent. In New Orleans, it’s 64%. In Baltimore, it’s 91%. Many were felons who had served time. And as many as 80% of the homicides were gang related.
Chicago’s problem isn’t guns; it’s gangs. Gun control efforts in Chicago or any other major city are doomed because gangs represent organized crime networks which stretch down to Mexico, and trying to cut off their gun supply will be as effective as trying to cut off their drug supply.
America’s murder rate isn’t the work of the suburban and rural homeowners who shop for guns at sporting goods stores and at gun shows, and whom news shows profile after every shooting, but by the gangs embedded in the urban areas controlled by the Democratic machine. The gangs who drive up America’s murder rate look nothing like the occasional mentally ill suburban white kid who goes off his medication and decides to shoot up a school. Lanza, like most serial killers, is a media aberration, not the norm.
National murder statistics show that blacks are far more likely to be killers than whites and they are also far more likely to be killed. The single largest cause of homicides is the argument. 4th on the list is juvenile gang activity with 676 murders, which combined with various flavors of gangland killings takes us nearly to the 1,000 mark. America has more gangland murders than Sierra Leone, Eritrea and Puerto Rico have murders.
Our national murder rate is not some incomprehensible mystery that can only be attributed to the inanimate tools, the steel, brass and wood that do the work. It is largely the work of adult males from age 18 to 39 with criminal records killing other males of that same age and criminal past.
If this were going on in Rwanda, El Salvador or Sierra Leone, we would have no trouble knowing what to make of it, and silly pearl-clutching nonsense about gun control would never even come up. But this is Chicago, it’s Baltimore, it’s Philly and NOLA; and so we refuse to see that our major cities are in the same boat as some of the worst trouble spots in the world.
Lanza and Newtown are comforting aberrations. They allow us to take refuge in the fantasy that homicides in America are the work of the occasional serial killer practicing his dark art in one of those perfect small towns that always show up in murder mysteries or Stephen King novels. They fool us into thinking that there is something American about our murder rate that can be traced to hunting season, patriotism and bad mothers.
But go to Chicago or Baltimore. Go where the killings really happen and the illusion comes apart.
There is a war going on in America between gangs of young men who bear an uncanny resemblance to their counterparts in Sierra Leone or El Salvador. They live like them, they fight for control of the streets like them and they kill like them.
America’s horrific murder rate is a result of the transformation of major American cities into Sierra Leone, Somalia, Rwanda and El Salvador. Our murder rate now largely consists of criminals killing criminals.
As David Kennedy, the head of the Center for Crime Prevention and Control, put it, “The majority of homicide victims have extensive criminal histories. This is simply the way that the world of criminal homicide works. It’s a fact.”
America is, on a county by county basis, not a violent country, just as it, on a county by county basis, did not vote for Obama. It is being dragged down by broken cities full of broken families whose mayors would like to trash the Bill of Rights for the entire country in the vain hope that national gun control will save their cities, even though gun control is likely to be as much help to Chicago or New Orleans as the War on Drugs.
Obama’s pretense that there needs to be a national conversation about rural American gun owners is a dishonest and cynical ploy that distracts attention from the real problem that he and politicians like him have sat on for generations.
We do not need to have a conversation about the NRA. We need to have a conversation about Chicago.
Were we to have that conservation about Chicago and the almost exclusively black violence found there (and in Birmingham, Memphis, Baltimore, Atlanta, etc.), what I’ve dubbed “Black-Run America” dies instantly.
That can’t happen.
So while Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel will prattle on about “values” in an attempt to reach out to black people and convince them to ‘stop the violence’, tribal warfare will continue to play out in the city.
But what are the real “values” of the black community (sic) in Chicagoland – also found in Birmingham and Baltimore – that make it increasing difficult for police to combat violence and retake the streets?
The Sound of Silence [Lack of cooperation stymies most shooting cases, Tribune finds: About 75 percent of the nearly 1,200 nonfatal cases are suspended because Chicago police struggle with victims’ mistrust, fear while trying to solve crimes, Chicago Tribune, 8-27-12]:
Chicago police have suspended nearly 80 percent of their investigations into nonfatal shootings on the grounds that victims wouldn’t cooperate, according to a review of more than 1,100 cases through the first seven months of the year.
The statistics are a stark reminder of both the level of violence on Chicago’s gang-infested streets, as well as the difficulties police face in trying to penetrate barriers of mistrust and silence that encompass the city’s most dangerous communities.
Under pressure for a homicide rate that is about 31 percent higher than last year, Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy has maintained that putting more officers on district beats will make neighborhoods safer as cops build trust among residents and knowledge of the streets they patrol.
But for now, the inability to solve the vast majority of shootings only aggravates the homicide problem.
“The bottom line is it’s frustrating. … That no-snitch code that’s still out there,” said Chief of Detectives Thomas Byrne. “Shootings are a precursor to a homicide.”
Through the first seven months of 2012, there were 1,165 nonfatal shooting cases in Chicago, according to police records reviewed by the Tribune. Investigations into 75.9 percent of those cases have been classified as “suspended” because the victims declined to cooperate with police, the statistics show. An additional 4.4 percent of cases have been designated “exceptional cleared closed,” meaning police have identified a suspect, but victims have declined to cooperate with a prosecution.
Without the cooperation of a shooting victim, police detectives have little hope of making a case against a suspect stick, multiple investigators said. And with a caseload that can exceed 100 shootings per year, detectives in the city’s high crime areas have little choice but to move on and try to make progress on homicides and other cases, one veteran investigator said.
Police said they often find themselves on the outside looking in at long-standing gang battles, where lack of cooperation may signal impending retaliation.
“Oftentimes, it’s just because they intend to handle it themselves,” said Deputy Chief John Escalante, who runs patrol operations on the North Side.
To head off such cases, Escalante said police try to identify associates of the victims who have histories with guns or violence and who may be tapped by the victim’s gang to carry out the retaliation. Police said they are also increasingly looking for other ways to get a suspected shooter off the street, whether it’s a drug charge, outstanding warrant or parole violation.
The late John Hughes, perhaps the most underrated director, writer, and producer in the history of Hollywood, was attacked for never having black characters in films. Not even secondary characters. He told the New York Times simply that he didn’t know the “black experience.” [Him Alone, by Bill Carter, 8-4-91]:
Certainly any criticism of Hughes’s work so far has to include the point that his everyman characters have rather narrow profiles. They are usually young, usually from the kind of upper-middle-class neighborhood where no one worries about paying the electric bill, usually estranged from their parents — and always white. There has never been a significant black character in any Hughes film. “I’m not going to pretend I know the black experience,” Hughes says, though when he’s confronted with the fact that there have been almost no black characters in his films, even in roles that would be race neutral, he concedes that the charge is “an entirely proper argument.” “Maybe I’ve been wrong,” he says, “through shortsightedness or whatever. But I’ll get there.”
The reason Pretty in Pink, She’s Having a Baby, Weird Science, Sixteen Candles, Home Alone, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, and other Hughes films all took place in the suburbs of Chicago was because white people knew the only place to raise their families in safe communities was as far removed from black people as possible.
High levels of black violence in the city of Chicago forced them to seek new communities to raise a family — what can only be dubbed the phenomenon of “urban genocide.”
That’s the experience with black people that most white people refuse to ever publicly discuss, for the sound of silence binds us all to a safe and comfortable life; to deviate from protocol and open our mouths to discuss that 800,000 lbs. gorilla and the reality of the “black experience” in Chicago, Baltimore, Atlanta, Birmingham, and other cities discussed in the Front Page Magazine piece is tantamount to putting a loaded gun to your head and pulling the trigger.
So.. are you ready for that conversation about Chicago?